Negational Fragment of Intuitionistic Control Logic
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Negational Fragment of Intuitionistic Control Logic
We investigate properties of monadic purely negational fragment of Intuitionistic Control Logic (ICL). This logic arises from Intuitionistic Propositional Logic (IPL) by extending language of IPL by additional new constant for falsum. Having two different falsum constants enables to define two forms of negation. We analyse implicational relations between negational monadic formulae and present ...
متن کاملLogic Programming in a Fragment of Intuitionistic Linear Logic
When logic programming is based on the proof theory of intuitionistic logic, it is natural to allow implications in goals and in the bodies of clauses. Attempting to prove a goal of the form D ⊃ G from the context (set of formulas) Γ leads to an attempt to prove the goal G in the extended context Γ ∪ {D). Thus during the bottomup search for a cut-free proof contexts, represented as the left-han...
متن کاملLogic Programming in a Fragment of Intuitionistic Temporal Linear Logic
Recent development of logic programming languages based on linear logic suggests a successful direction to extend logic programming to be more expressive and more efficient. The treatment of formulasas-resources gives us not only powerful expressiveness, but also efficient access to a large set of data. However, in linear logic, whole resources are kept in one context, and there is no straight ...
متن کاملIntuitionistic Control Logic
We introduce a propositional logic ICL, which adds to intuitionistic logic elements of classical reasoning without collapsing it into classical logic. This logic includes a new constant for false, which augments false in intuitionistic logic and in minimal logic. The new constant requires a simple-yet-significant modification of intuitionistic logic both semantically and proof-theoretically. We...
متن کاملAdmissible rules in the implication-negation fragment of intuitionistic logic
Uniform infinite bases are defined for the single-conclusion and multiple-conclusion admissible rules of the implication–negation fragments of intuitionistic logic IPC and its consistent axiomatic extensions (intermediate logics). A Kripke semantics characterization is given for the (hereditarily) structurally complete implication–negation fragments of intermediate logics, and it is shown that ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Studia Logica
سال: 2015
ISSN: 0039-3215,1572-8730
DOI: 10.1007/s11225-015-9610-7